|
Return to *North Korean Studies*
The Agence France-Presse reported that a US army general said the DPRK could make use of transportation corridors under construction between the ROK and the DPRK as ready-made invasion routes to the ROK. US Major General James Soligan was responding to the DPRK's refusal to continue work on the road and rail links unless the US-led United Nations Command (UNC) gives up its control of the corridors in the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) that divides the two Koreas. "The North Koreans would like to create this corridor outside the demilitarized zone and outside the authority of the armistice agreement," Soligan said in an interview with cable television YTN. "That way, if they elected to, they could move combat forces into this corridor and challenge the security of South Korea. North Korea is very uncomfortable being held accountable for their violations of the armistice agreement," said Sooligan. "So they would like to create an area that is outside the armistice agreement, so the world cannot hold them accountable for their actions." The US military official accused the DPRK of delaying the inter-Korean railway and road project that he fully supports. "It is North Korea who is electing not to move the process forward," he said. (NORTH KOREA COULD USE TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AS INVASION ROUTE," 11/26/02)
China Daily carried a commentary on the DPRK and ROK bilateral clashes on the maritime line saying that the Northern Limit Line (NLL)in the Yellow Sea between the ROK and the DPRK is becoming a flashpoint for conflicts between the two countries. Looking back at the past clashes around the controversial sea border from the early 1950s to the latest incident happened on November 20, the article said that over a long period of time, the ROK and the United Nations Command (UNC) mistook that DPRK accepted the maritime line however in 1973 the DPRK drew up a new sea border including five islands under ROK control, declaring that ROK vessels should obtain its approval before passing the water around the islands. Since then, the two countries have criticized each other for entering the other side's territorial waters. In conclusion, the article said that with the disputed border continuing to be the focus of ROK-DPRK confrontations, which are disharmonious with the improvement of inter-Korean ties mainly in the economic field, the two countries on the Korean Peninsula should sit at the negotiation table to redesign the line in order to avoid further conflicts. ("MARITIME LINE A FLASHPOINT OF CONFLICT," Seoul, 11/23-24/02, P4)
People's Daily reported that the DPRK people's navy headquarter condemned on November 21 in a declaration that the ROK navy vessels fired to the DPRK's patrol boats on the west coast of the Korean Peninsula. The declaration said that at about 2:00 p.m. local time on November 20, more than 10 unidentified boats illegally entered the DPRK's territorial sea. The DPRK navy sent boats to confront the invading ones while the ROK's navy vessels that were resided in the west-Baengryeong Island suddenly fired several shots to the DPRK's boat for warning, the report said. People's Daily also reported that the DPRK's patrol vessel violated the Northern Limit Line (NLL) 3.5 nautical miles off Baengryeong Island at 2:41 p.m. on November 20, according to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of ROK. JSC said that the ROK navy immediately dispatched four high-speed patrol boats and one other vessel to the area to confront the DPRK's boat, which retreated 14 minutes later after receiving two warning shots from the ROK side, the report said. (Xu Baokang, "DPRK AND ROK NAVY CLASH," Seoul, 11/22/02, P3) (Zhang Jinfang, "DPRK AND ROK NAVY CLASH," Pyongyang, 11/22/02, P3)
The New York Times carried an article asserting that last July, US intelligence agencies tracked a Pakistani cargo aircraft as it landed at a North Korean airfield and took on a secret payload: ballistic missile parts, the chief export of DPRK's military. The shipment was brazen enough, in full view of US spy satellites. But intelligence officials who described the incident say even the mode of transport seemed a subtle slap at Washington: the Pakistani plane was an American-built C-130. It was part of the military force that President Pervez Musharraf had told President Bush last year would be devoted to hunting down the terrorists of Al Qaeda, one reason the administration was hailing its new cooperation with a country that only a year before it had labelled a rogue state.
But several times since that new alliance was cemented, US intelligence agencies watched silently as Pakistan's air fleet conducted a deadly barter with the DPRK. In transactions intelligence agencies are still unravelling, the DPRK provided General Musharraf with missile parts he needs to build a nuclear arsenal capable of reaching every strategic site in India. In a perfect marriage of interests, Pakistan provided the DPRK with many of the designs for gas centrifuges and much of the machinery it needs to make highly enriched uranium for the country's latest nuclear weapons project, one intended to put at risk the ROK, Japan and 100,000 US troops in Northeast Asia. (David E. Sanger, "IN NORTH KOREA AND PAKISTAN, DEEP ROOTS OF NUCLEAR BARTER," Seoul, 11/24/02)
The Associated Press reported that in its latest effort to attract badly needed foreign investment, the DPRK said Monday that it has designated a prominent mountain resort as a "special tourism zone." The DPRK Supreme People's Assembly, adopted a decree on Saturday to create a Mt. Kumgang tourist zone where foreigners can invest freely, said the country's foreign news outlet, the Korean Central News Agency. The move is part of efforts by the DPRK to resuscitate its shattered economy. The DPRK launched economic reforms in July, but its efforts to attract foreign investment face difficulty partly because of tension over its nuclear weapons program. The decree says that the DPRK will retain sovereignty over the resort area and "permit free investment of corporate bodies, individuals and economic organizations" and "protect their properties by law." Otherwise, it was short on details, saying only that relevant state agencies will take measures to implement its terms. (Paul Shin, "NORTH KOREA DESIGNATES DIAMOND MOUNTAIN RESORT AS A SPECIAL TOURISM ZONE," Seoul, 11/24/02)
Xin Hua News Agency reported that DPRK officials plan to ban the use of US dollars inside the DPRK beginning next month as a standoff with the US over its nuclear weapons program drags on, the PRC's official Xinhua News Agency reported Saturday. US Dollars will not be accepted in foreign exchange shops and foreign residents must convert US dollars in their bank accounts into Euros or other currencies, Xinhua said in a dispatch from Pyongyang. Bank accounts will be converted automatically if their owners don't make the switch by the end of November, it said, quoting a statement from the DPRK's Trade Bank on Friday. Similar requirements have been in place for DPRK citizens since last Monday, it said. The report could not be independently verified. ("REPORT: NORTH KOREA TO BAN USE OF US DOLLARS FROM DECEMBER," Beijing, 11/23/02)
Хождение американского доллара будет запрещено в КНДР с декабря текущего года. Как сообщило агентство Xinhua, эта мера принимается Пхеньяном в ответ на прекращение США поставок нефти Северной Корее. Теперь жители КНДР и иностранцы должны будут перевести свои долларовые счета в государственном Торговом банке в евро или другую конвертируемую валюту. "С начала декабря гостиницы, пункты обмена валюты и службы, связанные с обслуживанием дипломатического корпуса, не будут получать доллары США", - заявил сотрудник Корейского Торгового банка. Банк также обратился с просьбой ко всем находящимся в КНДР дипломатическим миссиям и международным представительствам отказаться от использования долларов и расплачиваться евро и другой валютой, передает ABC News (RBK 23 November 2002 in Russian)
The Associated Press reported that the DPRK won't win concessions from the outside world through nuclear "brinkmanship" because the impoverished nation is more reliant than ever on foreign food and oil, the ROK's unification minister said Friday. "North Korea's dependency on food and oil from the outside makes them unable to use brinkmanship," Jeong Se-hyun told reporters at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan. "There is that effective leverage working for the international community." Jeong said the dependancy leaves the isolated communist country in no position to diplomatically strong-arm relations with its neighbors, and added: "North Korea has nothing to gain by threatening the international community with nuclear weapons."
The DPRK has relied on foreign countries for 30 percent of its food supply over the last six years, Jeong said. And roughly half its fuel oil comes from overseas. The situation worsened last week, when a US-led energy consortium decided to halt aid shipments of oil to punish the DPRK for its nuclear weapons program. Jeong held out hope that the deal to supply Pyongyang with 500,000 metric tons of oil a year could be salvaged, although the DPRK has hinted the deal is dead. "I don't believe this means an end of the framework. They haven't said it's the end, nor has the United States," Jeong said. "It's part of an ongoing psychological battle." (Audrey McAvoy, "NORTH KOREA WON'T WIN AT 'BRINKMANSHIP,' SOUTH'S UNIFICATION MINISTER SAYS," Tokyo, 11/22/02)
The Associated Press reported that in another blow to a 1994 nuclear deal with the United States, the DPRK, has barred a U.S.-led consortium from inspecting how the DPRK is using deliveries of fuel oil, an ROK official said Friday. The move followed a decision last week by the US and its allies to suspend oil deliveries to the DPRK beginning in December to punish it for a secret nuclear weapons program that violates the 1994 deal. The last shipment of oil arrived in the DPRK earlier this week on a tanker from Singapore. But the DPRK denied access to half a dozen inspectors whose job is to monitor where the oil goes, an ROK Foreign Ministry official said on condition of anonymity. The oil is meant to fuel power plants to alleviate the DPRK's desperate energy shortages, and there is concern that it could be diverted to the communist country's massive military.
Japan's Kyodo News said the US-led consortium, the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, had planned to send inspectors to the DPRK next week. It cited an unidentified KEDO official. On Thursday, the DPRK said the 1994 Agreed Framework had collapsed, and said the US was at fault because it suspended the oil deliveries. ROK President Kim Dae-jung urged the US and the DPRK to seek a compromise to keep the divided peninsula free of conflict. "The two sides should cooperate," Kim's office quoted him as saying. "North Korea must give up its nuclear weapons program and when that happens, the United States should guarantee the North's right to exist." (Sang-Hun Choe, "SOUTH KOREAN OFFICIAL: NORTH KOREA BARS OIL INSPECTORS," Seoul, 11/22/02) and the Associated Press (Sang-Hun Choe, "SOUTH KOREA URGES US, NORTH KOREA TO COOPERATE," Seoul, 11/22/02)
The Agence France-Presse reported that ROK officials were divided on the DPRK's first official response to a decision by the US and its allies to suspend fuel oil shipments to the energy starved nation. "They didn't threaten to retaliate," said one official in the foreign ministry, "but nor did they agree to do anything positive." Analysts and officials said a key phrase in the DPRK foreign ministry statement referred to "the collapse" of a US-DPRK arms control accord at the heart of the nuclear dispute. "Now that the US unilaterally gave up its last commitment under the framework, the DPRK (North Korea) acknowledges that it is high time to decide upon who is to blame for the collapse of the framework," said the statement carried Friday by the Korean Central News Agency.
It was unclear from the statement issued late Thursday whether the DPRK considered that the accord under which it agreed to freeze its nuclear weapons programme was beyond repair. The ROK government is still hoping the DPRK will directly address the nuclear question. So far, the DPRK has said it will resolve "US security concerns" if Washington agreed first to sign a non-aggression pact with the reclusive communist state. Washington has rejected the demand. "The position of the South Korean government is that nuclear development by North Korea must not be tolerated under any circumstances," Unification Minister Jeong Se-Hyun said Friday. ("OFFICIALS DIVIDED ON NORTH KOREA RESPONSE ON NUCLEAR DISPUTE," 11/22/02)
Korean Central News Agency reported that spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea today issued a statement as regards the fact that on November 14 the US announced a decision to stop supplying heavy oil to the DPRK from the upcoming December. The statement says: The decision is a wanton violation of article 1 of the framework which stipulates that the United States of America, representing the Korean Energy Development Organization in accordance with the October 20, 1994, guarantee message of the US President, shall adopt a measure to make for the loss of energy in return for the freezing of the graphite moderated reactors and their related facilities of the DPRK till the completion of light water reactor no. 1 and it shall supply heavy oil for the use of heat and electricity production as alternative energy. The above-mentioned article is the only one of the four articles of the framework that has been observed.
With a view to playing down the responsibility for breaking its international commitment, the U.S. described the decision as "collective will" of KEDO member nations. It is as clear as noonday that in actuality the US Government made a decision to stop supplying heavy oil before forcing it upon KEDO which is not a signatory of the framework. In making public the decision the US claimed that the DPRK violated the framework first. Now that the US unilaterally gave up its last commitment under the framework, the DPRK acknowledges that it is high time to decide upon who is to blame for the collapse of the framework. It is well known to the world that the US has violated the framework and boycotted the implementation of its commitments. The US assertion that the DPRK violated the framework is a burglary logic of America-style superpower chauvinism that a big country may threaten a small country as it wishes but a small country should not try to cope with such threat. The US is seriously mistaken if it thinks this logic will work on the Korean Peninsula. ("DPRK FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKESMAN ON US DECISION TO STOP SUPPLYING HEAVY OIL," Pyongyang, 11/21/02)
Joongang Ilbo reported that ROK naval ships fired warning shots Tuesday afternoon at DPRK naval patrol boat that intruded across the Northern Limit Line in the Yellow Sea. The Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in ROK said the vessel retreated back across the line after 14 minutes. Defense officials said DPRK vessel was probably checking on the activities of 20 PRC fishing vessels in its waters when it intruded three kilometers to ROK. Under new rules of engagement set up after a deadly naval clash in the area last June, a ROK ship fired 76-millimeter guns in warning, a Joint Chiefs spokesman said, adding that four other ROK patrol boats had maneuvered in a show of force before the two warning shots were fired. After the June naval clash, in which five ROK sailors were killed, a military investigation noted several problems in intelligence handling. The modified rules of engagement allow the navy to fire warning shots earlier after an intrusion is seen. (Kim Min-seok, "WARNING SHOTS FIRED AT NORTHERN SHIP," Seoul, 11/21/02)
Pyongyang, November 21 (KCNA) -- A warship of the South Korean army committed such a grave military provocation as firing a gun at a patrol boat of the Korean People's Army (KPA) navy on its routine patrol duty in the West Sea on Nov. 20. In this regard the KPA navy command released a press release on Nov. 21. It says: At around 14:00 on Nov. 20 a patrol boat of the KPA navy rushed to the scene to intercept more than 10 unidentified vessels that had illegally sailed into the territorial waters of the DPRK.
Timed to coincide with this, a warship of the South Korean army on alert in waters west of Paekryong islet threatened the patrol boat of the KPA, navy, suddenly firing several artillery shells towards it. The reckless provocation committed by the South Korean warship in broad daylight can not be construed otherwise than a deliberate and premeditated move of the South Korean military to aggravate the military tensions between the north and the south, keeping pace with the U.S. frantic nuclear racket. The South Korean military authorities have recently persisted in their military provocations by sending warships one after another to the territorial waters of the DPRK in the West Sea.
In November alone they illegally infiltrated 15 warships into the territorial waters of the DPRK five times including those provocations perpetrated on Nov. 12, 13, 16 and 19. The reality proves that the South Korean military seeks to push the situation in the West Sea to an extreme pitch of tension as was the case with the last West Sea clash in a bid to curry favor with the U.S. keen on the moves to put international pressure upon the DPRK and isolate it. The KPA warns the South Korean military authorities not to run amuck, clearly understanding that such military provocations committed, pursuant to the U.S. strategy, may spark a new clash and entail irrevocable consequences.
The Associated Press reported that a new CIA estimate says the DPRK has enough stored plutonium to make several more nuclear weapons in addition to the "one or possibly two" it already is believed to possess. The plutonium has been under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision under a 1994 US-DPRK agreement. As for the new weapons program disclosed to U.S. officials last month, the CIA said it recently learned that the DPRK "is constructing a plant that could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for two or more nuclear weapons per year when fully operational - which could be as soon as mid-decade." The analysis said the DPRK began work on a uranium-based bomb about two years ago. DPRK officials told US diplomats last month that it undertook the uranium program early this year in response to hostile rhetoric from the US, including President Bush's designation of the DPRK as a member of an international "axis of evil."
Henry Sokolsky, of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, said the CIA assessment plus data from other sources suggests that the DPRK could have seven or eight nuclear weapons by the end of next year. He said PRC government figures indicate that the DPRK already has five or six weapons, many more than the CIA estimate. Once two additional plutonium-producing nuclear reactors, now under construction, are completed, Sokolsky said the DPRK's bomb production capacity would greatly increase. He added that, politically, there is not much difference between one nuclear bomb and eight because an adversary country, such as the ROK would have to take measures to protect against all potential targets, not knowing which one or ones would be attacked. (George Gedda, "CIA SAYS NORTH KOREA HAS MEANS TO BUILD SEVERAL MORE PLUTONIUM-BASED BOMBS," Washington, 11/21/02)
By Staff Writer, Korea Times, November 18, 2002
GENEVA (Yonhap) - South Korea had directly provided North Korea with $65.5 million in humanitarian aid as of Oct. 27 this year, accounting for just under 35 percent of the $188.11 million total supplied by the international community, according to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). The United States gave the socialist country $63.46 million, 33.74 percent of the total, to become the second biggest provider of aid. Individuals and non-governmental organizations provided $24.86 million, representing 13.32 percent of the total to place third in the rankings.
The European Commission came fourth with $11.56 million, followed by Germany with $4.46 million, Australia with $3.42 million, Britain with $2.86 million, Canada with $2.73 million, Sweden with $2.71 million and Norway with $2.35 million. In addition, North Korea received a total of $114.99 million in humanitarian aid from various UN agencies, including $63.47 million (55.19 percent) donated by the United States and $16.24 million (14.12 percent) from South Korea.
By Staff Writer, Korea Times, November 18, 2002
GENEVA (Yonhap)-Last month's confession by North Korea that it has been operating a nuclear weapons development program could hamper UN humanitarian aid projects in the famine-stricken country next year, the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said Sunday. Asking major aid-giving countries and organizations to contribute a total of $225.29 million in humanitarian aid to North Korea next year, OCHA expressed concern that the communist country's confession to running the nuclear weapons development program could have a significant impact on the nature and scale of humanitarian aid supplied next year as 2003's aid projection was made
before Pyongyang's nuclear admission.
The nuclear weapons development program has already hampered North Korea-Japan rapprochement talks and would also reduce by half the planned participation by industrial countries in the communist country's economic development projects. In addition, the heightened tension on the Korean peninsula would turn working conditions for international humanitarian aid officials in North Korea from bad to worse, which may in turn cause the agencies to pull out or prompt countries to reduce their aid projects.
Noting that North Korea's economic conditions have not improved since 1995 when it began receiving humanitarian aid, the UN agency said major aid-giving countries have become tired of their prolonged aid programs because of a lack of tangible results. OCHA's estimate of $225.29 million breaks down into $197.16 for food, $17.01 million for medicine, $4.88 million for agricultural development, $445 million for city water and public health, and $1.19 million for education. The U.N. agency initially asked for $258.13 million in humanitarian aid for North Korea this year before reducing that figure to $246.83 million. It had secured $114.99 million, including $80.74 million brought forward from last year's budget, as of Oct. 27.
CNN, November 17, 2002
BEIJING, China -- Up to one third of North Korea is at risk from starvation amid rising political tensions on the Korean peninsula and cuts to international food donations, the United Nations has warned. Despite a recent small recovery in harvests from earlier famine levels, the U.N. says that moves by donors such as Japan and the United States to cut back on aid threatens over six million North Koreans.
Speaking to reporters in Beijing, James Morris, Executive Director of the World Food Program (WFP), warned that children and babies would be among the hardest hit by aid shortfalls. He said that a severe slump in global grain donations and falling support from traditional donors could see the WFP cut back still further on an already severely curtailed feeding program.
"We are in a very serious predicament," said Morris speaking after his first visit to the isolated Stalinist country. He said the level of the WFP's work in North Korea was slashed by 50 percent in September, but was faced with further heavy cuts as the year draws to an end. "It's not inconceivable that we would have to cut the program in half again," he said. Morris said that shortages had already forced the WFP to totally cut supplies in one region to such critical groups as pregnant women, children and the elderly. They now had to survive only on meagre government supplied rations.
Children at risk
North Korea, he said, "is a place of very severe malnutrition, acute malnutrition and some chronic malnutrition. Children are severely at risk." The United Nations says that several long-standing donors are losing their ability and political will to continue contributing food aid. North Korea has been suffering from years of famine, blamed on a combination of bad weather and inept economic management.
Aid agencies say tens -- possibly hundreds -- of thousands of North Koreans have died of starvation of malnutrition, although official figures are a secret jealously guarded by the North Korean regime. Although one of the world's poorest countries, North Korea recently admitted to a visiting U.S. delegation that it had continued with efforts to build a nuclear weapons in contravention of a 1994 agreement. Aid officials say international anger over that admission, combined with competition from other regions of the world needing food aid, could drastically cut the amount of food they are able to provide to North Korea.
Accountability
However, Morris said he did not believe the cuts in donations were part of an effort to punish the North Korean people for the actions of their leaders. Rather, he said, the problem was more one of accountability -- guarantees from the North Korean government, so far not forthcoming, that aid was getting to those who need it. Critics of the North Korea regime have accused the government of diverting aid to feed the country's massive army, rather than the most needy among its population.
With the prospect of another food crisis as the bitter North Korean winter looms, Morris said the WFP was looking to China as a possible donor to fill the gap if contributions from other countries fell short. He added that plans by the United States and its allies to halt fuel oil shipments to North Korea -- agreed to under the 1994 deal -- would exacerbate the country's already serious energy crisis, adding to the food shortages.
"Lack of energy means that it is much more difficult to produce fertilizer," Morris said. "It means that what mechanized agriculture there is doesn't have the energy required." He said operations at factories supported by the WFP producing fortified baby foods were also likely to be hit by the resulting energy cuts.
The Associated Press, November 16, 2002
BEIJING (AP) - North Korea's harvests are recovering from famine levels, but millions could still starve as donors like the United States withhold food aid amid rising political tensions, the U.N. World Food Program said Saturday. None of the agency's three biggest donors to North Korea - the United States, Japan and South Korea - have stepped forward to offer any support for next year, said Executive Director James T. Morris. He blamed a combination of ``political and administrative reasons'' for the cut-off. ``We simply do not have resources from our donors to do the work at the level needed for the rest of this year, and we virtually have no
commitments for next year,'' he said.
The reclusive communist regime has angered its benefactors by admitting it had tried to secretly develop nuclear weapons and had kidnapped a dozen Japanese citizens 25 years ago, some of whom died under mysterious circumstances. North Korea has relied on outside food aid since the collapse of its planned economy triggered a famine in the mid-1990s that killed as many as 2 million. While North Korea grew 5 percent more rice and other cereals this year than last year, it will still be 1.1 million tons short of enough to feed its 25 million people, Morris said. The agency hopes to provide at least a half-million tons of food next year to feed 6.4 million people it said are
the most at risk. Morris said he will travel to Seoul and Tokyo to seek more aid.
Last year, Japan accounted for 45 percent of the $103 million in aid distributed in North Korea by the World Food Program, Morris said. This year, it donated nothing. Morris said he was in Beijing to urge the Chinese to help make up the shortfall. Lack of food has been one reason thousands of illegal North Korean migrants have flooded into China. ``This part of the world has a crisis on its hands,'' he said. Morris also expressed frustration at North Korea for hindering aid efforts. He said U.N. officials are often prevented from checking on food distribution, and many areas of the country remain off limits. ``It is hard to understand why any roadblocks are put in our way,'' Morris said.
by Kim In-ku, Chosun Ilbo, November 14, 2002
Nearly 45 percent or one million out of 2.2 million children under the age of five in North Korea suffer from malnutrition and diseases, domestic aid organization for North Korea the Headquarters for Childhood Medical Supplies (www.healthchild.org) announced in a report released Wednesday. The report on the actual condition of nutrition among North Korean residents and children was made public prior to a symposium on the realities of North Korean childhood health to be held in the Sejong Center for the Performing Arts on November 16. NKHCMS said of the one million with malnutrition and disease, two thirds and more
than 20 percent of them suffer from acute chest complaint and diarrhoea, respectively and the death rate was 80 percent.
It also said the death rate among pregnant women has been steadily growing due to malnutrition and the shortage of obstetrical examination. It said an outbreak of malaria last year affected 295,570 people up from 2,100 in 1998, but this was reduced to 90,806 as of July 2002. The report drew material from previous work by the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
Reuters reported that the DPRK sent analysts scrambling for a day to try to decipher what appeared to be a claim that it had nuclear weapons, before quieting the buzz today by revising the broadcast. A commentary on Radio Pyongyang on Sunday night had included a sentence that seemed, to some ears, to move North Korea's official position beyond its often-stated stance that the country is "entitled" to possess nuclear weapons. According to a report by the ROK's Yonhap news agency, the broadcaster said North Korea had "come to have" the weapons. Yonhap's report caused analysts in Seoul and Tokyo to play and replay tapes of the broadcast today. After much straining and repetition, the verdict was mixed. But Radio Pyongyang late today rebroadcast the commentary, substituting a clearly enunciated segment for the confusing sentence. The rebroadcast stuck to its long-held position on entitlement, quietly ending the flap. (Paul Eckert, "NORTH KOREA REVISES CONFUSING NUCLEAR REPORT," Seoul, 11/18/02), Washington Post (Doug Struck, "N KOREA QUIETS BUZZ ON NUCLEAR ASSERTION," Tokyo, 11/19/02) and the New York Times (Howard W. French, "NORTH KOREA CLARIFIES STATEMENT ON A-BOMB," Okyo, 11/19/02)
Joongang Ilbo reported that DPRK must take specific actions to verify its intention to scrap a secret nuclear weapons program if it wants the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization to resume the delivery of fuel oil shipments to the communist country, Unification Minister Jeong Se-hyun said Monday. In an executive board meeting held last week, the US-led consortium said it will freeze oil shipments to DPRK from December unless the country takes visible and verifiable measures to drop its nuclear weapons program. "And when they said visible and verifiable it most certainly includes international inspection even after the North scrapes its nuclear program," Jeong said in his speech hosted by Korea Society based in New York (American time). "Just a mere mentioning of words to abandonment would not be enough." "In the world of politics sometime even a single day could be as long as a lifetime of an average man," Jeong pointed out indicating the North is running out of time. "The North better go into specific actions within a month." ("NK NEEDS MORE ACTION, ASSERTS UNIFICATION MINISTER," Seoul, 11/19/02)
The Associated Press reported that despite tensions over its recently disclosed efforts to develop nuclear weapons, the DPRK pledged to push ahead with all joint projects with the ROK, including plans to reconnect rail and road links across their border, a news report said Tuesday. The statement was broadcast by state media in the DPRK a day before officials of the ROK and the DPRK were to meet to review the progress made on the high-profile rail- and road-building projects. "No matter how perversely the United States behaves, our people will push ahead all inter-Korean economic cooperation projects, including cross-border railways and roads, more vigorously," the DPRK Central Radio broadcasted. The statement was attributed to Pak Chang Ryun, the DPRK's chief delegate at ongoing economic talks with the ROK. (Paul Shin, "REPORT: NORTH KOREA PLEDGES TO PUSH AHEAD WITH INTER-KOREAN PROJECTS DESPITE NUCLEAR TENSIONS," Seoul, 11/18/02)
Chosun Ilbo reported that DPRK's state-run Radio Pyongyang broadcast Sunday the country "has come to have nuclear and other strong military weapons to deal with increased nuclear threats by the U.S. imperialists." DPRK has so far used future tense expressions concerning the right to possess nuclear weapons to stand against US pressure and the language, which appeared to go further than DPRK's previous claims to "be entitled to have nuclear weapons," may have been deliberately misleading as using the "past tense" is a first for the DPRK. A DPRK Foreign Ministry spokesman said in a statement on October 25 that it has nuclear weapons and even stronger weapons. Insisting that it was US side who violated the international agreements, including the 1994 Geneva agreement and non-proliferation treaty, the radio reported, "in the situation where the US and warlike forces proclaim the right of pre-emptive strikes on us on the assumption of having nuclear weapons, we cannot stand still." (Kim In-ku, "PYEONGYANG SAYS IT HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS," Seoul, 11/19/02)
Pyongyang, November 17 (KCNA) -- The United States is spreading a whopping lie that the DPRK violates the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and the DPRK-U.S. Agreed Framework. The lie is aimed to tarnish the international prestige and authority of the DPRK and isolate the DPRK on a worldwide scale. And it is a cunning plot to cover up the criminal nature of the U.S. posing nuclear threats to the DPRK and divert the public attention at home and abroad elsewhere. Rodong Sinmun says this in a signed article today.
Owing to the U.S. deliberate delay of light water reactors project, the DPRK has suffered a great loss of power and undergone grave economic difficulties. And it is seriously threatening the DPRK right to existence. The U.S. described the DPRK as part of an "axis of evil" and listed it as a target of preemptive nuclear attack. The U.S. warmongers are now clamouring for a preemptive strike on the DPRK, presupposing the use of nuclear weapons. This is a declaration of war, a nuclear war against the DPRK.
Therefore, the U.S. openly violated and destroyed the DPRK-U.S. Agreed Framework and nullified the north-south joint declaration on denuclearization. It is the independent right and the peace initiative of the DPRK that it proposed to the U.S. to conclude a non-aggression treaty between the DPRK and the U.S., a reasonable and realistic way for solving the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula. For the U.S. to accede to the DPRK's proposal is its legal and moral duty as a nuclear weapon state. It is in full accord with the main spirit and purpose of the NPT and the DPRK-U.S. Agreed Framework. The U.S. is well advised to clearly understand the reality and make a right option.
Pyongyang, November 16 (KCNA) -- There is no reason for the DPRK to show any longer magnanimity as regards the issue of missile test-fire as the Japanese side first backpedalled its commitment to redeem its past, a core point of the DPRK-Japan Pyongyang declaration, over the issue of kidnapping, says a spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry in an answer given to a question put by KCNA today as regards the increasing call to reconsider the DPRK's moratorium on its missile launch. The Japanese side created complication in the matter of handling a humanitarian issue, a product of the issue of abduction, by breaking the promise it made to the DPRK from the outset. This has caused the institution concerned and the people of the DPRK to strongly assert that it is necessary to reconsider a moratorium on the missile test-fire.
The army and the people of the DPRK are expressing bitter indignation at Japan which is hell-bent on the anti-DPRK smear campaign over the issue of a few kidnapped Japanese while refusing to disclose its unprecedented state-sponsored crimes committed against the Korean people in the past including the forcible drafting of millions of Koreans, crimes related to comfort women for the Japanese imperial army, massacres and other crimes aimed to exterminate the Korean nation, and unlimited plunder of cultural treasures and natural resources and to make compensation for them.
The DPRK expressed its willingness to keep moratorium on missile launch beyond the year 2003 in the DPRK-Japan Pyongyang declaration despite the grave threat posed to its sovereignty and right to existence by the U.S. escalated attempt to stifle the DPRK and Washington's scenario to mount a preemptive attack on it. This was, in fact, a most vivid manifestation of the DPRK's good faith, which took the ardent request of Japan into consideration. But the Japanese authorities are breaking faith with the DPRK, quite contrary to the promise made to it. Some elements in Japan do not bother to assert that "Japan may fight a war against North Korea". The opinion in Japan over the issue of abduction has gone to such extremes entirely because of the dishonest forces seeking confrontation with the DPRK at the instigation of outside forces, far from trying to find a solution to the issue with it. The promise made between the countries should be kept on the basis of reciprocity under any circumstances. "People's feelings" do not exist in Japan only.
CNN.COM 18 November 2002
North Korea has a nuclear weapon, Pyongyang Radio reported tonight. The revelation comes a month after the communist nation admitted it had a clandestine weapons program. North Korea has since said the crisis could be settled if the U.S. backed off its "hostile policy" toward the country...
КНДР впервые публично признала, что обладает ядерным оружием. Северокорейское правительственное радио передало в воскресенье официальный комментарий о том, что страна действительно обладает ядерным оружием. Об этом сообщает BBC. В заявлении резко критикуется политика США в отношении КНДР и сообщается, что Северная Корея разработала "мощные военные контрмеры, в том числе и ядерные вооружения", в ответ на "растущую военную угрозу США".
В радиокомментарии власти КНДР также выступили с "миролюбивым предложением" к США начать работу над "пактом о ненападении". По мнению Северной Кореи, это единственный приемлемый способ решения ядерной проблемы на Корейском полуострове. В последнее время на Пхеньян оказывается жесткое международное давление в связи с прозвучавшим в октябре заявлением американских дипломатов о том, что северокорейские коллеги признались им в наличии у КНДР активной программы создания ядерного оружия.
Представители КНДР неоднократно заявляли, что намерены укреплять свою военную мощь с целью отбить возможное нападение. Также не раз звучали из Пхеньяна и призывы к подписанию соглашения о ненападении с США. Белый дом, однако, отказывается вести дальнейшие переговоры с КНДР до получения предварительного согласия на ее разоружение. (BBC 17 November 2002 in Russian).
The Associated Press reported that a US-led international consortium's decision to halt fuel oil shipments as punishment for the DPRK's covert development of nuclear weapons may force many factories there to shut down, analysts said Friday. The decision will affect 500,000 metric tons (551,155 US tons) of fuel oil the DPRK has been getting annually since 1995 under an arms control deal it signed with the US a year earlier. "The KEDO decision will have a huge impact on North Korea which suffers an acute energy crunch," said Choi Su-young, a researcher at the Institute for National Unification, a government think tank. "Many more factories there may be forced to grind to a halt." The DPRK, which relies on imports for all of its oil requirements, gets about 1 million metric tons (1.1 million US tons) of crude oil from China a year, Choi said. "So, it's not difficult to figure out how serious the impact would be if KEDO's oil shipments are completely halted," he said. A study by the ROK's state utility, Korea Electric Power Corp., estimates that KEDO-supplied fuel oil accounts for about 10 percent of the DPRK's total energy needs. (Paul Shin, "CUT OFF OUTSIDE ENERGY ASSISTANCE, NORTH KOREA FACES A COLDER WINTER," Seoul, 11/15/02)
The Associated Press reported that the DPRK will sink deeper into diplomatic isolation and economic deterioration unless it abandons its nuclear weapons program, an ROK official said Friday after an international group suspended future oil deliveries to the DPRK. "I hope North Korea will understand well where we want to go on this issue. The ball is in the court of North Korea," a senior ROK government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We want to carry on putting more pressure on North Korea so they understand the seriousness of all countries involved." There was no response Friday from the DPRK which has said it is willing to resolve US security concerns in exchange for a non-aggression pact. The US has said talks are out of the question as long as the DPRK has a nuclear program. The United States and its allies hope North Korea, which desperately needs the fuel, will buckle under the pressure and dismantle its nuclear weapons program. (Christopher Torchia, "NORTH KOREA SILENT ON OIL EMBARGO," Seoul, 11/15/02)
The Associated Press reported that the DPRK congratulated PRC leaders Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin on their power transfer Friday, hoping to maintain close ties with the PRC and its new leadership. Kim also sent a message to congratulate President Jiang on his re-election to head the PRC's powerful military commission, calling it "an expression of deep respect and trust of your country, army and people in you." Kim said he hoped that bilateral ties will prosper and that China will succeed in "socialist modernization." ("NORTH KOREA WELCOMES POWER TRANSFER IN CHINA," Seoul, 11/15/02)
by Peter Hayes, November 15, 2002
On November 14, 2002, the KEDO Executive Board announced that it was suspending future deliveries of Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) to the DPRK (the text is provided in an accompanying Special Report) This action was reported by the New York Times and other news services as a cut off that would continue until the DPRK acts "to dismantle completely" its program to develop nuclear weapons (New York Times, November 15).
What KEDO actually said was: "Heavy fuel oil deliveries will be suspended beginning with the December shipment. Future shipments will depend on North Korea's concrete and credible actions to dismantle completely its highly-enriched uranium program." And KEDO said: "North Korea must promptly eliminate its nuclear weapons program in a visible and verifiable manner." The first statement places the onus on the DPRK to come back into compliance with its various agreements and obligations with regard to uranium enrichment. This is conceivable, albeit difficult to do both technically and politically...
by Peter Hayes, November 15, 2002
This Special Report provides background on the provision of HFO to the DPRK by KEDO. It shows that KEDO-supplied HFO is primarily a political rather than an energy concern to the DPRK. It reveals that KEDO's HFO is a small fraction of primary energy supply in the DPRK as well as of total fuel for electric power production. It is significant only in winter in thermal power production. However, while the humanitarian cost may be substantial in the DPRK due to reduced lighting and heating of occupied buildings in the midst of the freezing winter, the impact is unlikely to be translated into significant leverage on DPRK decision-makers.
Indeed, these impacts may increase the legitimacy of the DPRK leadership or lead to increased Chinese and Russian energy supply to the DPRK to make up the difference. The Special Report was prepared by Nautilus Institute staff and draws on a number of published analyses of energy and the DPRK, which are referenced in the Special Report. Finally, the Special Report provides the text of the KEDO decision to terminate HFO
supplies to the DPRK...
The Associated Press reported that the DPRK has decided against returning the captured spy ship USS Pueblo after indicating last month that it might do so, according to a former US official who met with authorities in the DPRK capital last week. Donald P. Gregg, president of the Korea Society and a former ambassador to the ROK, said yesterday that a deal for the Pueblo was hinted at in an October 3 letter in which Vice Foreign Minister Kim Gye Gwan invited him to visit Pyongyang. But when Gregg raised the issue during his November 2-5 talks with Kim and others, he said he was told, "The climate has changed. It's no longer an option."
Gregg said the Pueblo was not at its usual mooring and he was told it had been returned to Wonsan, on the opposite coast of DPRK, where it had been held for decades after its capture on Jan. 23, 1968. The capture of the Pueblo was one of the most shocking events of the Cold War. DPRK patrol boats seized the intelligence-gathering ship in international waters and one of the 83 US crew members was killed. The rest were removed from the ship and held prisoner for 11 months. Gregg said he had first discussed the Pueblo's return in a visit to Pyongyang last spring ("N KOREA CHANGES ON RETURN OF USS PUEBLO," 11/14/02)
.
Pyongyang, November 13 (KCNA) --The Korean Documentary and Scientific Film Studio has released documentary films based on the mass gymnastic and artistic performance Arirang. They are "days of creation of mass gymnastic and artistic performance Arirang, winner of Kim Il Sung Prize" and "mass gymnastic and artistic performance Arirang, winner of Kim Il Sung Prize." Edited in the first film are what cameramen experienced and witnessed during the creation of the performance. The film shows creators and performers in rehearsal grounds, working sites, houses and other places of the capital during their uninterrupted preparations of the performance in winter. The other film shows the whole course of the performance given before a capacity crowd, drawing worldwide attention. The films have their own distinct character quite different from other films in photographing, direction and edition.
by Kang Chol-hwan (nkch@chosun.com) Chosun Ilbo, November 6, 2002
With the reunion of separated families being realized continually and North Koreans getting economic help from their relatives in the South becoming rich overnight. North Koreans who look for their roots in the South are rising sharply in number, according to sources. One American dollar being exchanged for NKW350 in the market, a North Korean receiving a gift of say US$1,000 from his relatives living in the South comes into the possession of NKW35,000, a hefty sum in the North, equivalent to more than 10-year salaries of an ordinary worker, earning between NKW2,000 and NJKW2,500 a month.
The situation being such, some North Koreans returning home after meeting their split family members from the South have become the envy of the neighborhood, a far cry from the past when they were looked down upon. Some of them are taken to task by authorities or undergo unspeakable mental agonies for slips of the tongue they made in conversations with their South Korean relatives, said a North Korean source frequenting China. But they matter little when compared with the help coming from their separated families in the South, he said.
"Those who command public popularity in the North next to Koreans who have migrated from Japan now are citizens who have relatives living in the South," said a North Korean hailing from North Hamgyong Province, who is engaged in smuggling with China. "If a villager goes to Mount Kumgang or Seoul to get reunited with their split families, he or she attracts more attention from ranking officials in the neighborhood and different gaze from neighbors." Having been classified into the lowest level in family backgrounds, their children used to suffer various disadvantages. But their social status has so much been elevated that they now enjoy priority in the order in choosing
one's spouse candidates, according to the source.
"Money has become so important in North Korea that nothing is impossible to solve now with money," observed a Korean-Chinese who had lived in the North and who arranges for reunions of separated families between the two Koreas. "In place of favorable family backgrounds, having relatives in the South from whom one can get assistance following unification is considered as a condition of living a happy life in the North."
The North Korean regime's responses to unofficial split family reunions, realized outside official channels, are said to have become considerably moderate. Excepting the leakage of state secrets or secret documents, pure exchange of money and meetings between friends are classified as minor offenses, subject to six-months hard labor. Officials can be bribed into reducing such prison terms.
North Koreans who have returned home after meeting their relatives from the South are still subject to strict monitoring by authorities, giving rise to stresses, just as it was the case when migrants from Japan met their families living in Japan for the first time. To meet split families from the South, North Koreans have to take ideological training courses given by agencies tasked with South Korean affairs and the party committee. They have to nearly learn by heart many rules they should observe without fail during their meetings with their relatives. Failures cause various disadvantages to persons involved; hence nothing has changed in the practice that North Koreans
meeting their relatives from the South must take every care and caution in every word they utter and every action they take in such meetings.
By Donald Macintyre
, TIME ASIA, November 4, 2002/ Vol. 160 No. 17* With reporting by Kim Yeoshin/Seoul and Kim Yooseung/Yanji
North Korea is a monolithic black box to the rest of the world, but stress cracks can be seen in the aspiring nuclear power The teenager looks at least three years younger than his 17 years. His eyes dart around or lock on his shoe tops when he talks. But when you take him to a neighborhood restaurant and put a steaming plate of dumplings in front of him, he suddenly perks up and starts to look you in the eye. Walking for a day from his village in North Korea, he crossed the Tumen River into China in early October, hoping to earn some money to buy food for his parents. He doesn't want you to use his name or take his picture. If a copy of this magazine were to fall into the hands of North Korean authorities, "they'll really beat me up," he says. Jae Young — a pseudonym he agrees to — has heard about the economic reforms unveiled by his country's leaders in July. But all that's happened in his village, Jae Young says, is that the price of grain has gone up, leaving his family hungrier than before. He falls silent at the mention of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il, the man all North Koreans are taught to revere as a demigod. Jae Young has nothing to say on that topic except "There is nothing to eat."
Without knowing it, the stunted, starving young man speaks for a nation that is beginning to show the stress cracks of a bankrupt leadership. On Oct. 4, North Korea acknowledged that it was secretly trying to build nuclear weapons. The shocking admission, to senior U.S. diplomat James Kelly, was not made as a threat or a taunt. It was as much as anything else the distressed cry of a beleaguered nation running out of options. In fact, North Korea's nuclear confessions were among a stream of pronouncements issued from Pyongyang over the past few months, each one more surprising than the last. The country is scrambling to prop up its collapsed command economy with a dose of capitalism. The centerpiece of the reform efforts—a Chinese-style special economic zone in the northwestern town of Sinuiju—will probably never get off the ground, according to businessmen across the river in the Chinese city of Dandong. For one thing, the Chinese entrepreneur appointed to run it has been arrested by the mainland for unspecified wrongdoings. For another, the nuclear disclosure has put North Korea in U.S. President George W. Bush's gunsight. Who would invest there now?...
Joongang Ilbo reported that ROK government official said that DPRK is planning to reduce its armed forces by about 10 percent to free up labor needed for its economic reform measures. About 100,000 members of the Second Economic Commission, a part of DPRK' s armed forces assigned to logistics and civil engineering, will soon be discharged, the official said, quoting DPRK intelligence sources in Beijing. The economic commission was established in the early 1970s to manage military logistics. The National Defense Commission, headed by the DPRK leader Kim Jong-il oversees the economic unit, which is responsible for the
production and supply of military equipment, weapons and ammunition. It also runs an income-earning agricultural production and export business on the side. The official said that details of the timing and exact scale of the reduction have not been confirmed. (Kim Min-seok, Lee Young-jong, "SEOUL OFFICIAL SAYS NORTH TO CUT ITS FORCES BY 10%," Seoul, 11/06/02)
Joongang Ilbo reported that DPRK's Foreign Ministry spokesman Tuesday blamed Japan for the lack of progress on talks to normalize relations between the two countries, and said DPRK may reconsider its self-imposed moratorium on ballistic missile testing. Speaking through the state-run Korean Central News Agency, the unnamed spokesman said the spirit of trust between the two countries that was established when the leaders of the two countries met in September has suffered, as Japan has insisted, from "twisted logic." The two sides agreed to continue talks this month, but tense words have been exchanged since the Malaysia meeting. The lack of progress has led DPRK to review
several security issues, including "the nuclear and ballistic missile" issues, the spokesman told the press agency. The joint declaration released after the North-Japan summit in September referred to the possibility that the moratorium may be extended beyond 2003. (Kim Young-sae, "NORTH THREATENS TO RENEGE ON MISSILE TESTING BAN," Seoul, 11/06/02)
The Agence France-Presse reported that an international consortium is preparing a new shipment of fuel oil to the DPRK under a 1994 deal despite renewed concerns over the DPRK's nuclear weapons program, officials said here. The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) has already begun loading more than 40,000 tons of heavy fuel oil for November's shipment to the DPRK. "The loading of the fuel oil is underway in Singapore," a senior official from the Office of the Lightwater Reactor Project said Wednesday. "We are following the normal procedures as no decisions have yet been made as to whether to
continue the energy assistance or to stop it," he said. US Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly raised doubts whether the US would countenance any future payments towards fuel oil for the DPRK. "For next year though, I see very little support in the US Congress to continue providing these fuel shipments," Kelly said on Tuesday. ("OIL SHIPMENT TO NORTH KOREA GOES AHEAD DESPITE NUKE CRISIS," 11/06/02)
The Agence France-Press The United States has raised doubts that North Korea would receive its latest oil shipment mandated by a 1994 arms control pact which Pyongyang said was nullified last month when it confessed to developing nuclear weapons. The deal, known as the Agreed Framework, was supposed to freeze Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program in exchange for the provision of two nuclear power reactors and half a million metric tonnes of fuel oil a year until their construction is complete. The State Department said Tuesday it was discussing the fate of a shipment of more than 40,000 metric tonnes, recently loaded onto a tanker in Singapore, with fellow members of the
Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO). Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly, who secured the nuclear confession from the DPRK during a visit to the Stalinist state last month, said that a meeting of KEDO next week would take up the issue. "There is a board meeting next Monday that's going to decide whether that goes ahead," said Kelly. ("US RAISES DOUBTS OVER NORTH KOREA FUEL SHIPMENT," 11/06/02)
Yoichi Funabashi, Asahi Simbun
During the normalization talks, Ambassador Jong Thae Hwa described North Korea's determination for survival with the phrase ``no one is stronger than a person who is prepared to die.'' There is no guarantee that North Korea, which is driving itself to play such a ghastly game for survival, would not explode any time. Ambassador Jong Thae Hwa, who represented the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) at the Japan-North Korea normalization talks in Kuala Lumpur, had firmly maintained in past sessions that the abduction issue was a fabrication. As it turned out, he was telling a big lie. Despite recent developments, however, Jong did not speak any words of
``remorse'' this time. Properly speaking, his failure to express such sentiment made him a poor negotiator. The Japanese side should have clearly pointed it out at the negotiation table.
However, his Japanese counterpart, Ambassador Katsunari Suzuki, appeared nonchalant, perhaps because he stands by the belief that ``if necessary, professional diplomats must not hesitate to join hands with the devil.'' Furthermore, Jong, who has a military background, may be thinking that the job of diplomats is to ``lie for their country.'' Of course, Ambassador Jong is no devil. In past sessions, he was known to hit the table in a fit of fury, but this time, it seems he neither walked out of the room in a rage nor abused the Japanese side. In a press briefing, a Foreign Ministry official spoke about the North Korean attitude concerning the Pyongyang declaration signed
at the Japan-North Korean summit and said: ``We felt that they have a strong bearing to sincerely abide by it because it was signed by whom they refer to as `Dear Leader.''' Since when has the Foreign Ministry begun to call General Secretary of the Korean Workers Party Kim Jong Il ``Dear Leader'' (even with the notation ``whom they refer to as'')?..
By David Ljunggren, November 5, 2002
OTTAWA (Reuters) - The United Nations World Food Program (WFP) warned on Tuesday that a serious funding shortfall meant it might again be forced to slash food distribution in Stalinist North Korea. The WFP, which has been feeding about a third of North Korea's 23 million people, began halting food aid to millions of hungry children, women and elderly people in September because of a slump in grain donations. By the end of the year, some three million people will be cut off and another 1.5 million may follow early next year. "We've had to cut our work in North Korea in half and I'm concerned we may have to cut it in half again ... I'm very troubled about how we're going to
do our humanitarian work in North Korea going forward," said WFP Executive Director James Morris.
"Japan has historically given us $100 million a year to feed the people in North Korea. They've not been able to do that this year and that's a serious resource shortfall," he told Ottawa's National Press Club. Last year Japan topped the list of international donors with a donation of 500,000 tonnes (490,000 tons) of grain. Some analysts say Tokyo turned off the taps this year in frustration at a lack of progress in political talks, which have now resumed. The prospects for the talks are unclear. Pyongyang, increasingly isolated over a secret nuclear arms program, threatened earlier on Tuesday to reconsider a moratorium on test-firing missiles if talks on normalizing ties
with Japan failed to make progress. The isolated, heavily armed state -- branded part of an "axis of evil" by U.S. President George W. Bush -- has been hard hit by several years of natural disasters, chronic food and energy shortages, and economic mismanagement.
"We keep our focus on feeding the hungry poor and try to be as narrow in our outlook as we possibly can, not to get hung up on all the other very troublesome political issues," said Morris, expressing optimism that the fall harvest would help alleviate problems in the short term. Washington has said more aid to North Korea would be conditional on Pyongyang giving more freedom to humanitarian organizations such as the WFP. Morris said that although the WFP had made great strides, working conditions inside North Korea were very difficult. "We asked the government of North Korea to give us a list of the institutions that receive the food. We don't get adequate reports. We
don't have a good understanding with the government about the evacuation of our personnel if they have a health problem," he said. "It's mind-boggling to me, I must say, when you're trying to do nothing but save lives and feed people and do humanitarian work, why some governments make it so difficult."
by Han Sung-Joo, November 5, 2002
Despite our tremendous foresight when we were planning for this lecture, we did not quite anticipate that relations between North and South Korea would be at such an interesting juncture. We should have known, however we could even have bet our last dollar that just about any time is an interesting time to talk about this subject. But today, it seems even more so. In fact, I was at this campus to give a talk on a similar topic early this year. That was on February 1st, three days after the famous "axis of evil" speech by President Bush. At the time, by including North Korea as a member of his notorious axis, President Bush squashed any hope of an early U.S.-North Korea
rapprochement.
Today, with Pyongyang's admission that they have been engaged in an enriched uranium nuclear weapons development program, the situation on the Korean Peninsula, not to speak of relations between the United States and North Korea, seems to be entering a rather rough period. Perhaps I can address this problem by asking a few key questions and venturing to answer them. First, given North Korea's commitment under the 1994 Geneva Agreed Framework to freeze all nuclear activity in return for light water reactors and a supply of heavy oil, why did it decide to restart its nuclear weapons program and thus violate, even flout, the agreement?
Joognang Ilbo reported that ROK and DPRK have agreed to begin building an industrial zone in Kaeseong, DPRK, next month. The target is to allow South Korean firms to establish plants in the zone beginning in late 2003. The two Koreas are also reportedly near an agreement on tourism programs in the city northwest of Seoul across the Demilitarized Zone that could begin early next year. After three days of talks in Pyongyang, delegates from the ROK and the DPRK announced the agreement Saturday. Two ROK firms, Hyundai Asan Corp. and the state-run Korea Land Corp., will develop 3.3 million square meters of land by the end of next year in the first stage of a project to turn 66
million square meters of land into an industrial zone. DPRK said it will set up a new legal system for the zone, making it a special district with tax benefits and a minimum of interference in the use of the land, the operation of plants located there and funds flows. (Kim Young-hoon, "CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN NEXT MONTH'S KAESEONG INDUSTRY PARK," Seoul, 11/04/02)
Pyongyang, November 4 (KCNA) -- Self-sufficiency in the economy elucidated by the Juche idea is a guiding principle of the party and state activities for applying an independent stand and creative stand in the revolution and construction. Adhering to the principle of self-sufficiency in the economy means building an economy which is free from dependence on others and which stands on its own feet, an economy which meets the material demand of one's own people and country by itself. The Juche idea clarifies that economic self-sufficiency is essential for definitely guaranteeing the political sovereignty and independence of the country and providing an independent and
creative material life to the popular masses. Only on the basis of economic self-sufficiency, can any nation defend the political sovereignty, build a prosperous independent and sovereign state and provide an independent and creative material life to the popular masses.
In order to achieve economic self-sufficiency, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of self-reliance and build an independent national economy. One cannot build an independent national economy and solve one's own problems by depending on others. If an independent national economy is to be built, the economy must be developed in a diversified and integral way and establish one's own reliable and independent sources of raw materials and fuel. It makes it possible to fully meet the material requirements of one's own country and people and develop the economy in a safe and forward-looking manner. The Juche idea gives a scientific exposition of the principle of economic
self-sufficiency and ways of achieving it, thus providing an ideological and theoretical weapon to build a powerful independent and sovereign state and make an independent development of the nation by strengthening the country's economic independence and consolidating the material and technical foundations of socialism.
Chosun Ilbo reported that the plan to send 400,000 tons of oil to DPRK this week has been temporarily halted it was learned Sunday. An ROK government official announced Sunday, that alongside the US and Japan a final decision upon sending the oil will be made around November 15 after the Trilateral Coordination and Oversight Group, or TCOG meeting scheduled to open in Tokyo and Seoul from November 8. Considering limiting various aid sent to DPRK, the three countries also reached an agreement to make concrete counter plans in case DPRK continues its clandestine nuclear development programs. In accordance with this, the three are considering boycotting a Nuclear Accident
Compensation Protocol meeting between KEDO and DPRK originally scheduled for this month. The official said, the US, Japan and ROK will continue its firm principal requesting prior suspension of DPRK's nuclear program and if it fails to comply, phased counter measures will be applied. (Kwon Kyung-bok, "OIL FOR NORTH SUSPENDED TEMPORARILY," Seoul, 11/04/02)
Pyongyang, November 3 (KCNA) -- The army-based policy of the DPRK is an independent and patriotic policy that protects the dignity, security and interests of the nation from imperialist aggression, says Rodong Sinmun today in a signed article. The army-centered policy is the wisest policy adopted in view of the history of national sufferings in which its sovereignty was wantonly violated by foreign forces, the article says, and goes on:
The policy serves as a treasured sword of justice to bring down a sledge hammer upon the heads of the imperialists who encroach upon the sovereignty and the vital rights of the Korean nation, and a powerful driving force pushing forward the movement for independent national reunification.
The north and the south of Korea are exposed to grave encroachment and threats by the U.S. imperialists. The U.S. is posing a nuclear threat to the Korean Peninsula, while trying to mislead the public opinion with much ado about "nuclear weapons program" of the DPRK. Lurking behind their moves is a sinister intention to disarm the DPRK and deprive it of its vital rights so as to enslave all the Koreans. Once they trigger a war against the DPRK, South Korea will not go safe. If a nuclear war breaks out in the small Korean Peninsula, all the Koreans in the north and south will suffer from it. From a logical viewpoint, the DPRK's army-based policy is the most independent and
just patriotic policy to foil the U.S. imperialists' moves for aggression and protect the dignity and interests of the whole nation including South Koreans.
Pyongyang, November 2 (KCNA) -- The first meeting of the panel for the construction of the Kaesong Industrial Zone took place here from October 30 to November 2 under the agreement reached at the 2nd meeting of the north-south committee for the promotion of economic cooperation. An agreement adopted at the panel meeting said that the north and the south decided to hold a ground breaking ceremony for the construction of the Kaesong Industrial Zone in December and actively cooperate with each other in the efforts to complete the first phase development of one million Phyong of the zone by the year 2003.
It was decided that the north side would recommend that a law on the zone would be promulgated in November to rapidly push forward the construction and provide labour force necessary for the construction and the south side render the biggest possible cooperation so that the construction of external infrastructure including electricity, telecommunications and water service may be sped up in a commercial manner.
The north and the south agreed to discuss and solve the issues of passage, customs, quarantine and telecommunications related to the construction through the committee and working-level contacts between those concerned of both sides when railway and road links are reconnected. They also agreed to set up an office concerned of the south side in the zone when it is built and hold the 2nd meeting of the panel for the construction in Seoul in December 2002. The authorities of the two sides decided to actively cooperate with each other for the implementation of the agreement.
Reuters reported that the DPRK defended what it said was a right to have nuclear weapons -- without saying if it actually had them -- and renewed calls on Friday for the US to sign a non-aggression pact. At a rare news conference in the DPRK's embassy in Beijing, Ambassador Choe Jin Su repeated an October 25 Foreign Ministry statement that blamed the administration of President Bush for the nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula and said the US had violated a key 1994 agreement. "Reckless political, economic and military pressure from the Bush administration is seriously threatening our right to subsistence, creating a grave situation on the Korean peninsula," he said
though a translator. "We told the special envoy of the US president that we were entitled to possess not only nuclear weapons but any type of weapon more powerful than that in order to protect our sovereignty and right to subsistence from an ever growing U.S. nuclear threat," he said. (John Ruwitch, "NORTH KOREA REMAINS DEFIANT ON NUCLEAR OPTION," Beijing, 11/01/02)
by John Feffer, November 1, 2002
For a supposedly changeless, monolithic state, North Korea shakes up the staid world of diplomacy with surprising frequency. In the past four months, Pyongyang has initiated dramatic economic changes, stunned Japan with its confession of abductions, appointed a Chinese-born tycoon to oversee its newest free-trade zone, and sent its first-ever boatload of athletes, musicians, and cheerleaders to South Korea to participate in the 2002 Asian games. In the latest stunner, North Korea revealed in early October to a visiting U.S. delegation that it has violated international agreements with a secret uranium enrichment program.
So often on the receiving end of carrot-and-stick policies, North Korea has been trying its own alternation of sweet and sour. The summer began on a sour note. At the end of June, in what has become a semi-annual clash during the lucrative crab harvesting season, North and South Korean boats exchanged fire in a disputed area of the West Sea, leaving four ROK sailors and an estimated thirty DPRK sailors dead. Planned negotiations with the United States immediately evaporated. With North Korea refusing to acknowledge dispatching a spy boat sunk by Self Defense Forces in December 2001, relations with Japan were also at an impasse...
Pyongyang, November 1 (KCNA) -- The U.S. imperialist warhawks made over 200 espionage flights against the DPRK in October, according to military sources. Mobilized for the espionage were strategic and tactical reconnaissance planes of different missions including U-2, RC-135, E-3 and RC-12. These planes took off U.S. air force bases in South Korea, Japan and other areas overseas and made shuttle flights in the sky over the area along the military demarcation line to spy on the forefrontal areas of the DPRK and its depth. The cases of espionage by U-2 high-altitude strategic reconnaissance plane, RC-135 strategic reconnaissance plane and E-3 commanding plane numbered over
30. 20 more U.S. espionage flights were committed in October than September. They were timed to coincide with the military moves escalated by the U.S. administration to stifle the DPRK by force of arms under the pretext of a "nuclear issue".
By Kang Chol-hwan (nkch@chosun.com), Chosun Ilbo, October 30, 2002
It has recently been learned that the notorious public executions carried out across North Korea in the latter half of the 1990's are all but gone since 2000, and that the family life of political prisoners has eased significantly. "Under Kim Jong Il's order issued to the State Security Agency and border guards early in 2000: 'Don't fire shots in the Republic,' no public executions have been carried out in the North, particularly in the border area," said a North Korean who has fled to China and who had served with the border guard.
Recalling the gruesome 1998 executions in public in Musan County, North Hamgyong Province of organized gangs, convicted of plundering electricity and communication wires, contraband trade and human trafficking with China, another North Korean who is connected with the State Security Agency, and who is engaged in smuggling with China, said that not a single public execution has taken place in the North since 2000.
Murderers, state property destroyers and public fund embezzlers, who would have been executed in public in the past, are now given prison terms of up to 20 years, said still another North Korean who used to be a ranking bureaucrat in the Hyeryong city administration, North Hamgyong Province. Most felons who would have been sentenced to death in the past are now given life terms, he added. The purported suspension of open executions is reportedly ascribed to censure by the world community.
Pyongyang is also said to have suspended punishing the families of political criminals, unless involved in grave offenses. "Incidents still occur in the border area such as Musan and Chongjin in which alleged smugglers with China and the South are taken by the State Security Agency, only to be seen no more," claimed a North Korean who has connections with the state security outfit. "But their families are no longer affected." Such families are still placed under surveillance, though, and the incidents have increased in number in which alleged political offenders are detained by the authorities and go missing without trace being given, according to the source.
Though public executions have drastically declined in number in the face of the strong disapproval and criticism in the international community, claimed a North Korean defector in the South, executions still take place within State Security Agency facilities and prisons as frequently as before. "Unless Pyongyang undergoes a fundamental changes with respect to human rights, political offenders would continuously be confined in concentration camps without undergoing formal trials; and some would be executed in secret," opined the defector.
Joongang Ilbo reported that DPRK will receive a US$10 million agricultural development loan from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, the organization said Tuesday. The money will be used for construction of an irrigation system in North Pyongyang province, the fund said. The loan is repayable over 20 years with a five-year grace period. It is the second time that DPRK has benefited from an OPEC Fund agricultural development loan. A US$5 million loan was given in 1999. DPRK's Agricultural Ministry plans to build a 660-meter-long dam and a 64-kilometer irrigation canal to supply waters to 100 cooperative farms. ("OPEC WILL LEND NORTH $10
MILLION FOR A DAM," Seoul, 10/31/02)
Joongang Ilbo reported that Taiwanese companies are interested in investing in DPRK, but reluctant to press ahead due to a lack of trust in its government, according to the chairman of the Chinese National Association of Industry and Commerce. Jeffrey L. S. Koo, who is also chairman of China Trust Financial Holding Co. and an economic adviser to Taiwanese President Chen Shuibian, was speaking at the Confederation of Asia-Pacific Chambers of Commerce and Industry's 19th conference in Seogwipo, Jeju island, Wednesday.
Koo said many Taiwanese firms were afraid to invest in DPRK after it recently acknowledged abducting Japanese civilians. Koo said he was optimistic about continued economic cooperation between Taiwan and PRC. He said PRC had become the biggest importer of Taiwanese goods, recently surpassing US, and that over 50,000 Taiwanese firms had invested in the mainland. More than 100 businessmen from 22 Asia-Pacific nations attended the meeting. The confederation, founded in 1966, is based in Taipei and the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry is a regular member. (Choi Hyung-kyu, "TAIWAN CAUTIOUS ABOUT NORTH," Seoul, 10/31/02)
Agence France-Presse reported that the DPRK's stance during recent normalisation talks with Japan raised doubts about the sincerity it showed at a landmark summit just a month ago, Japanese media said. "This marks the first real negotiations since Prime Minister (Junichiro) Koizumi visited North Korea, and there was plenty to indicate that choppy waters lie ahead," the Asahi Shimbun said in an editorial. "North Korea's response raises doubts about how serious it is about carrying out the content of the Pyongyang Declaration," it said, referring to a joint statement signed by Koizumi and DPRK leader Kim Jong-Il in Pyongyang last month. Two days of bureaucrat-level talks
between the sides ended in discord in Kuala Lumpur on Wednesday as Pyongyang rebuffed Tokyo's requests about its nuclear weapons program and the families of Japanese citizens kidnapped to the DPRK. DPRK officials said a solution to the nuclear issue lies only in talks with the US and dismissed the kidnapping matter as "almost settled".
The country meanwhile pressed for talks for reparations for Japan's wartime colonial rule of the Korean peninsula. But papers said the DPRK should realize its nuclear threat is of paramount importance to Japan and that economic aid would only come later. "With the combination of its nuclear development and its missile program, there is no greater menace to Japan," the Yomiuri Shimbun printed. "Saying it will only negotiate with the United States on this issue, North Korea will only cause the failure of talks with Japan," it said. "The Bush administration has no intention of negotiating with Pyongyang over nuclear weapons," the Asahi said. "North Korea should realise that without Japan's involvement, there will be no movement on this issue." ("JAPANESE PRESS LAMBASTS NORTH KOREAN STANCE DURING TALKS," 10/31/01)
The Washington Post, reported that the DPRK halted its recent moves toward conciliatory diplomacy at talks this week with Japan and set the stage for confrontation with the outside world over its program to develop a nuclear bomb. In two days of talks, the DPRK refused to dismantle its nuclear program without direct negotiations with the US and balked at reuniting with their parents the children of five released kidnap victims who are in Japan on a "visit." By refusing to negotiate with Japan over its nuclear program, the DPRK shunned a diplomatic route that could have defused a potential showdown with the US. The
DPRK has instead demanded talks on the nuclear issue solely with the US. The Bush administration has said it will not negotiate with the DPRK. Japanese negotiators acknowledged disappointment in the deadlock at the end of the talks tonight. "Although we made utmost efforts, to our regret, we failed to secure a change in their position," Japan's chief negotiator, Katsunari Suzuki, told reporters. [This Washington Post article originally appeared in the US Defense Department's Early Bird News Summary.] (Doug Struck, "N. KOREA BACKS AWAY FROM DIPLOMACY," Tokyo, 10/31/02)
The Korean Central News Agency carried a story that said, US high-ranking authorities reportedly called on the DPRK to scrap its nuclear weapons program, asserting that the US would not resume talks with the DPRK and calling for putting international pressure upon it under the pretext of its nuclear issue. The DPRK can not but clarify its resolute and principled stand on the issue as the US is disclosing its bellicose attempt to drive the military situation on the Korean Peninsula to a nuclear showdown, far from opting to improve the DPRK-US relations. The US is misrepresenting the situation as if the DPRK had breached the DPRK-US agreed framework. But the stark reality
proves that the assertion is nothing but sheer sophism.
The Bush administration has pursued a hostile policy to stifle the DPRK by force. The US is chiefly to blame for reducing to dead documents all international agreements and conventions, including the DPRK-US Agreed Framework (AF), the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), and the north-south joint declaration on denuclearization. It is foolhardy of the US to calculate that it can destroy the DPRK's powerful armed forces whose offensive and defensive means are more powerful than when the AF was released in 1994. If the US continues turning down our proposal and posing nuclear threats to the DPRK, the latter will be
left with no option but to take a corresponding measure. The US assertion will only spark a new clash. ("KCNA REFUTES US CLAIM FOR SCRAPPING DPRK'S 'NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM,'" Pyongyang, 10/31/02)
by Glyn Ford, October 30, 2002
Next year's crisis on the Korean Peninsula has come early. 2003 was to see a change of regime in South Korea, markedly less sympathetic to engagement with the North than current President Kim Dae Jung, the final failure of the US to deliver the North two promised nuclear power stations, and the expiry of North Korea's self-imposed moratorium on missile testing; an explosive conjuncture of events. All were pre-empted by North Korea admitting that - aided and abetted by Pakistan - they have been engaged in a clandestine programme to produce enriched uranium since the end of the 1990s, breaching Agreements made with the US in 1994.
The question is why has North Korea's leader triggered such a crisis now? The answer is two-fold. First, they see the US as comprehensively failing to deliver technically, politically and militarily on the promises of 1994, and with Iraq in US sights, an opportunity to negotiate a new comprehensive solution rather than precipitate US military adventurism by breaking US hawks attempts to neatly sequence action against the three 'Axis of Evil' regimes. Secondly, they need international aid. North Korea has taken a series of, almost certainly irreversible, steps transforming their command economy into one where the market plays a central role. The old system of guaranteed
food delivered through the People's Distribution Centres has, since the 1st of July, been superseded by an emphasis on producers and production, where massive increases in wages are available as an incentive. The old emphasis on equality that allowed free riding has been swept away. Now agriculture and industry have to be competitive. Yet these very changes pose a threat. Over the past five years, one in eight of the population has died of starvation. Food production still fails to match demand, many factories lack fuel and raw materials but not workers. With no work possible, millions now face an even bleaker future. The consequences can only be eliminated by greater,
rather than less, aid and assistance.
by Steve LaMontagne, October 30, 2002
North Korea's recent admission that it has continued to pursue a nuclear weapons program in violation of the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty, the 1992 Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and the 1994 Agreed Framework caught the United States off guard and startled the world. As the Bush administration endeavors to mount a coordinated international response, it is important to consider the status of North Korea's nuclear program, possible reasons for its disclosure, and the implications of various response options.
When Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly visited North Korea in early October, he presented his counterparts in Pyongyang with U.S. intelligence suggesting that North Korea had sought and acquired materials necessary to build gas centrifuges to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. Pakistan may have provided key assistance to North Korea, possibly as a quid pro quo for ballistic missile technology allegedly received from Pyongyang in the late 1990s. Russia and China may also have provided assistance to North Korea, although both countries deny it...
Nicholas D. Kristof
New York Times, October 29, 2002. The scariest place in the world right now is not Iraq, but rather the Korean peninsula. We're being blackmailed by a nuclear power, and so President Bush is in an exceptionally difficult situation - one that he has handled very ably so far. But the administration's game plan to isolate North Korea is, as our allies are desperately trying to tell us, potentially catastrophic. President Bush wants to squeeze North Korea into abandoning the uranium enrichment program to which it recently confessed. North Korea has enough plutonium in Yongbyon to rapidly make at least five nuclear weapons, possibly more. That's its leverage: threatening to turn Yongbyon into a nuclear assembly line, which in turn might ultimately lead Japan and South Korea to go nuclear as well. So play the scenario out. We cut off fuel oil and introduce sanctions. Then North Korea revives Yongbyon and threatens to uncan the plutonium.
From there, it's easy to imagine the U.S. bombing Yongbyon (both the first Bush and the Clinton administrations had contingency plans to do just that), after which North Korea lashes out with artillery at Seoul. In fact, North Korea's ballistic missiles probably can't reach the continental U.S. Still, North Korea's artillery can destroy Seoul. Don Oberdorfer, in his book "The Two Koreas," cites an estimate from a former American commander in South Korea that a war could kill one million people, including 100,000 Americans. In the coming months, the most delicate problem in international relations will be how to negotiate an end to this crisis. If all sides play their cards wisely, we could not only defuse the confrontation, but also launch North Korea on a path like the one China pursued away from Stalinism. North Korea is the most totalitarian country in the world, and possibly the most dangerous adversary we face. But that's precisely the reason we need to engage it.
By Naomi Koppel, The Associated Press
October 29, 2002. GENEVA - North Korea said it has zero unemployment, free education and free health care but admitted it has not provided adequate food and housing for its citizens in recent years because of a series of natural disasters, the government said in a report to the United Nations. In a long-overdue report to the U.N. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the reclusive communist nation said it had been steadily improving its citizens' standard of living until floods and other disasters struck. "A number of industrial facilities and equipment were submerged and destroyed by pouring rain, drought, tidal waves, typhoons and other natural disasters,"
the report said. "The shortage of power, fuel, facilities and materials affected the overall national economy and people's lives."
The government said grain production fell from 9.1 million tons in 1990 to 2.5 million in 1995, rising only slightly in the following years. Ten percent of children under seven were malnourished in 2000, it said. The government added that many people lost their homes in flooding. "The state stresses the construction of houses to stabilize people's lives as soon as possible even if they lack many things and the situation is still hard," it said. The economy also was affected by "the collapse of the socialist market," the report said ? a reference to the dismantling of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. However, the North Korean government said everybody was committed to
working to put the country back on track. "The different sectors of the national economy gradually recovered their production ability, readjusted the basis of the independent national economy and laid the firm foundation for a new leap forward."
Tens of thousands of impoverished North Koreans have tried to flee repression and hunger in their country, but many have been returned by neighboring China, which considers them to be illegal migrants. The report said every person had the right to join a labor union, but added, "the forming of a trade union that endangers the state security and harms the healthy state and social order is forbidden." Similarly, it said, people have the right to hold demonstrations as long as they do not harm state security. The report will be considered by the U.N. committee, which oversees an international convention on economic, social and cultural rights, at a future meeting, probably
next year. Countries are supposed to produce a report within a year of ratifying the convention, and then every five years after that.
North Korea ratified the accord in 1981 but only produced its first report in 1989. This is the second report.
The convention is one of a series of treaties that cover basic human rights. It does not deal with issues such as prevention of torture, political rights and racial discrimination. Cash-strapped North Korea has recently shown signs of opening to the outside world in an attempt to win economic aid. It is currently holding talks with Japan to discuss establishing diplomatic ties. In 2000 it produced its first report to a U.N. human rights body in more than a decade when it set out its compliance with the Convention on Civil and Political Rights. In response, the panel that monitors the treaty issued an extensive range of recommendations covering the country's use of the
death penalty, torture, trafficking, lack of freedom of movement, unfair trials and political prisoners. "The observance of human rights is obligatory for all nations whether they are capitalists or socialists," it said.
Agence France-Presse reported that the ROK believes the DPRK possesses some 4,000 ton of biochemical weapons and has built as many as three crude nuclear weapons, the ROK's intelligence agency chief told lawmakers. In testimony to the parliament's Intelligence Committee Monday, Shin Kun, director of the National Intelligence Service, said the DPRK was capable of producing some 4,500 tons of weapons annually. Pyongyang began its biochemical weapons program about four decades ago. "The North is believed to have a stockpile of between 2,500-4,000 ton of biochemical weapons," an opposition Grand National Party (GNP)
lawmaker, Lee Yoon-Sung, quoted Shin as saying. "We are unable to judge how powerful those biochemical weapons are as we have yet to confirm the accuracy of their delivery systems and whether the North has made those weapons compact enough to deliver." The weapons would have been built using some seven to 22 kilograms (15 to 49 pounds) of plutonium the DPRK is believed to have extracted before it opened nuclear facilities to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections in 1992. ("NORTH KOREA BELIEVED TO POSSESS UP TO 4,000 TONNES OF BIOCHEMICAL WEAPONS," 10/29/02)
The Associated Press reported that the DPRK has rejected demands that it give up its nuclear weapons program, a Japanese official indicated as Japan and the DPRK were engaged in talks aimed at normalizing diplomatic relations. "Japan expressed grave concern on nuclear issues and we also referred to the statement issued last week by Japan, the United States and South Korea. To put it in one sentence North Korea's response was they do not accept it at all," said the official. The statement by the three countries, issued on Saturday, demanded the DPRK immediately give up its quest for nuclear weapons. The Japanese official said the response came from the head of DPRK's delegation to the talks in the Malaysian capital, DPRK's roving ambassador Jong Thae-Hwa, who "went on to say America's hostile stance toward North Korea is to blame. ("N. KOREA REJECTS CALL TO GIVE UP NUCLEAR WEAPONS," 10/29/02)
by Ralph A. Cossa, October 29, 2002 Pacific Forum CSIS
Seoul: Is it deja vu all over again on the Korean Peninsula? The short answer is "yes!" . . . and "no!" North Korea seems to be following its time-honored pattern, witnessed most prominently during the 1993-94 nuclear crisis that lead to the now "nullified" Agreed Framework. Like today, the North was then suspected of cheating on nuclear-related international agreements: the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) and its associated International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safeguards Agreement. Its response was to announce a planned withdrawal from the NPT, thus creating a diplomatic crisis that came
uncomfortably close to resulting in a military confrontation. (Then-U.S. Secretary of Defense William Perry has acknowledged that the U.S. was very close to resorting to military force - a surgical strike against the Yongbyon nuclear facility - before former U.S. President Jimmy Carter inserted himself into the process and led the two sides away from a confrontation and toward a negotiated settlement under the Agreed Framework.)
Having been once again caught cheating, Pyongyang has resorted to form, this time surprisingly admitting its sins before seemingly walking away from the Agreed Framework and once again creating a diplomatic challenge that could lead to hostilities if mismanaged. For Pyongyang it seems to be business as usual. North Korea's second in command, Kim Yong-nam, has reportedly said that Pyongyang is now ready to engage in dialogue to "resolve security concerns" with Washington if the U.S. is "willing to withdraw its hostile policy" toward the North Meanwhile, Radio Pyongyang continues to claim that the North has been fulfilling its Agreed Framework commitments "more than 100
percent," calling U.S. allegations "ridiculous," even as Kim Yong-nam was assuring his ROK interlocutors that "we are taking the recent situation seriously"...
Reuters reported that the DPRK raised its cereal production this year but is still desperate for food aid, the United Nations said on Monday. "In spite of an increased harvest, a significant number of families in North Korea are still unable to meet their food needs," two U.N. food agencies said in a special report. "The country will again have to depend on substantial external food assistance," the Rome-based U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation and World Food Programme said. Separately on Monday, the WFP -- the world's largest food aid agency -- said it was struggling to feed 6.5 million people in the DPRK as funding shortages had forced it to suspend some emergency relief operations there. A joint FAO-WFP mission, which visited North Korea from September 24 to October 5, forecast 2002/03 cereal production at 3.84 million ton, the best harvest since 1995/96 and up 4.9 percent from last year. Favourable rains during July and August benefited the main crops in 2002, and international aid agencies provided farmers with fertilizers and pesticides, FAO and WFP said. The mission estimated the cereal deficit in 2002/03 (November/October) at 1.084 million tons and said the DPRK could only fill a fraction of the gap with commercial imports. ("NORTH KOREAN FOOD OUTPUT RISES BUT SITUATION STILL DIRE," Rome, 10/29/02)
Joongang Ilbo reported that RPC has warned US that DPRK may possess between three and five working nuclear weapons, twice the estimate of the US intelligence community, a British newspaper reported Sunday. Quoting unnamed diplomatic sources, the Sunday Times reported that the figure was based on Chinese intelligence reports. The information was passed to US officials last week with a warning that "a confrontation with DPRK's erratic dictator, Kim Jong-il, would spell disaster," the newspaper said. The Central Intelligence Agency of US has long suggested that DPRK had obtained enough plutonium to build one or two weapons before the 1994 Geneva Agreed Framework froze DPRK's
program. According to the daily, PRC appeared to have concluded that DPRK acquired enough uranium from a new program to make several more devices. (Ser Myo-ja, "NORTH STORE PUT AT 3-5 BOMBS," Seoul, 10/28/02)
JoongAng Ilbo. October 27, 2002. The World Food Program has made an urgent request for 220,000 metric tons of cereal to the international community last Friday. In the Emergency Report No. 43, the organization stated it requires 72,000 tons of cereal to cover the needs of vulnerable people on North Korea's west coast for next two months and another 130,000 metric tons of cereals for the first quarters of the year 2003. The report has it 18 factories in the North that produce flour and powdered milk for pregnant woman, nursing mothers and children are in danger of closing down by January next year without immediate help. By next month another three million babies, students
and pregnant women will suspended of their food ration nearby Yellow Sea region and some 1.5 million population in East Sea region by early next year. The report especially expressed concern toward the growing children likely to be affected by the malnutrition of their early days for rest of their lives.
The London Sunday Times reported that the US has been warned by the PRC that the DPRK may have between three and five working nuclear weapons, twice the CIA's estimate. Diplomatic sources say the PRC based their figure on intelligence reports and told US officials last week that a confrontation with the DPRK would spell disaster. The PRC appear to have concluded that the DPRK obtained enough uranium from a second clandestine program to make several more devices. Evidence has emerged to suggest the CIA is coming round to this theory. Experts believe the DPRK has succeeded in miniaturizing their weapons to make warheads for their ballistic missiles. The latest generation of DPRK missiles is capable of hitting anywhere in Japan. Although the missiles could also reach Alaska, the chief worry for US planners is that 37,000 troops in the ROK and bases in Japan could be prime targets. [This London Sunday Times Article appeared in in today's edition of the US Department of the Defense's Early Bird news summary.] (Michael Sheridan, "KOREANS MAY HAVE FIVE NUCLEAR MISSILES," Seoul, 10/27/02)
Pyongyang, October 26 (KCNA) -- Under the cloak of "aid" and "cooperation" the imperialists claim that those countries which undergo economic woes cannot stand to their feet without their capital and technology. They seek an ulterior aim through this. Rodong Sinmun today says this in a signed article. Being aggressive and predatory, the imperialists do not do others favour. Obvious is the aim they seek through "aid." Through the "aid" they seek to openly interfere in the internal affairs of the underdeveloped countries and those countries that incur their displeasure in a bid to force their view on value and social structure upon those nations, westernize all
fabrics of the social life of their peoples and thus establish an imperialist order based on subjugation and domination.
The United States is keen to force other countries to accept the American way of life under various pretexts of "aid," "loan," "joint development," etc. with a view to Americanizing them and establishing a monopolistic high-handed order. No country has achieved economic progress or prosperity because of the imperialists' "aid."
As their financial crisis is getting serious and their "aid" policy does not work on others, the imperialists are now resorting to crafty tricks to economically subjugate the underdeveloped countries through the multi-national companies' export of capital. The foreign capital which the imperialists advertise as if it were a big help is nothing but capital to rake up maximum profits. Not a few countries are in the grip of social and economic chaos and ethnic dispute because they were not aware that the imperialists' "aid" and foreign capital are a noose of subjugation and looting but harbored illusions and depended on them. An illusion about imperialism leads to death.
This is a historical lesson.
by Wada Haruki, October 25, 2002
1. It was indeed a shocking confession and apology. Admitting that North Korea in the late 1970s and early 1980s had abducted 13 Japanese, of whom eight had died and five survived, Chairman of the DPRK National Defense Commission, Kim Jong Il, apologized for it. It was admitted that 10 of the 11 on the list of suspected abductions published by the Japanese government had indeed been abducted. Yokota Megumi had been abducted, and so had three dating couples. Worst of all, the fact that 8 had died showed how savage state crime can be. It was astonishing to learn that Arimoto Keiko, together with Ishioka Toru, who is said to have been l